Introduction

New quality management standards were published by the FRC in July 2021 moving the emphasis away from quality control to a more proactive quality management system.

The new standards are:

  • International Standard on Quality Management (UK) 1 – Quality Management for Firms that Perform Audits or Reviews of Financial Statements, or Other Assurance or Related Services Engagements (ISQM (UK) 1); and
  • International Standard on Quality Management (UK) 2 – Engagement Quality Reviews (ISQM (UK) 2); and
  • International Standard on Auditing (UK) 220 (Revised July 2021) – Quality Management for an Audit of Financial Statements (ISA (UK) 220).

The standards are generally effective for audits and reviews of financial statements for periods beginning on or after 15 December 2022, however Systems of quality management in compliance with this ISQM1 is required to be designed and implemented by 15 December 2022 and the evaluation of the system of quality management required by paragraphs 53–54 of this ISQM (UK) is required to be performed within one year following December 15, 2022. Early adoption is strongly encouraged.

Our methodology content providers Mercia and Croner-i will be updating their Practice Manuals to assist your firm’s compliance with the standards. We continue to work closely with them to ensure that we produce accurate and timely audit documentation which will enable you to carry out high quality audit engagements.

Methodology Providers

Mercia

Mercia Service provider quality statement

Mercia have produced a quality control manual to help firms ensure that all the relevant risks and their responses are adequately documented. Details can be found here.

Mercia content mapping to CCH Audit Automation

Croner-I (PCAS)

Croner-I Service provider quality statement

Croner-I have created a quality control manual to help firms ensure that all the relevant risks and their responses are adequately documented. Details can be found here.

PCAS content mapping to CCH Audit Automation

Latest Master Packs versions available in CCH Audit Automation (as from Nov 2025)

MERCIA PCAS CCH

IMER 21 - Mercia Company Audit Pack Version 21

IPCAS 21 - PCAS Company Audit Pack Version 21

IFULL 16 - CCH Company Audit Pack Version 16

IMERG 21 - Mercia Group Audit Pack Version 21

PAAPCH 19 - PCAS Charity Audit Pack Version 19

IGROUP 16 - CCH Group Audit Pack Version 16

MERPEN 14 - Mercia Pension Audit Pack Version 14

PAAPPEN 17 - PCAS Pension Audit Pack Version 17

CCHCH 17 - CCH Charity Audit Pack Version 17

MERCHA 19 - Mercia Charity Audit Pack Version 19

PCASAD 13 - PCAS Academy Audit Pack Version 13

CCHLLP 15 - CCH LLP Audit Pack Version 15

MERLLP 14 - Mercia LLP Audit Pack Version 14

PCASNA 18 - PCAS Audit Exemption Pack Version 18

IPEN 11 - CCH Pension Audit Pack Version 11

MERACD 13 - Mercia Academy Audit Pack Version 13

IPENEM 10 - CCH Pension Audit Pack Earmarked Scheme Version 10

MERAEX 20 - Mercia Audit Exemption Pack Version 20

LAP 15 - CCH Limited Assurance Audit Pack Version 15

NONAUD 25 - CCH Audit Exemption Pack Version 25

ISMALL 12 - CCH – Small Company Audit Pack Version 12*
* No longer used with ISA315 revised standard (from November 2022)

Related documents

Inherent Risk Questions
This document outlines the process for assessing inherent risk in clients through a systematic approach of questions. The system can store up to 99 risk areas, each containing 99 questions, which are assigned point scores for "Yes" and "No" answers. It details steps for editing, adding, and deleting risk areas and questions, including interface navigation and confirmation prompts. Additionally, it emphasizes that once numbers are assigned to risk areas or questions, they cannot be changed. The document serves as a guide for managing inherent risk assessments effectively.
Audit Risks
This document details the functionality of CCH Audit Automation for recording Identified Audit Risks, also referred to as Significant Business Risks. It provides instructions for users to add, edit, and manage risks, including features for maintaining risks for future audits, assessing their significance, and linking them to assertions. The system includes tools for risk assessment, audit response, and documenting conclusions. Other functionalities encompass risk summarization, printing options, and risk linkage across multiple sources, enhancing the audit process's efficiency and accountability.
Default Specific Risk Questions
CCH Audit Automation allows users to define specific risk questions for audit areas, although it's not mandatory. If no specific questions are set, default questions will be used. Users can edit the default questions through the "Specific risk questions" option in the Risk Model section. Up to 99 default questions can be defined, similar to inherent risk questions. The system utilizes a lookup table that combines specific and inherent risks for audits, with editing instructions provided in the manual.
Risk/Sample Selection
This document outlines the concept of audit risk, defined as the likelihood of undetected material errors during an audit. It introduces a risk model used in Audit Automation that requires total audit risk to remain below acceptable levels across various audit areas. The risks are broken down into inherent risk, control risk, and detection risk, with further subdivisions for detection risk. It emphasizes the importance of understanding these concepts to design effective audit procedures and assess risk at different levels. Additionally, it discusses general and control environments, and the calculation of residual risk, alongside a risk scoring system.
Inherent Risks
The document outlines the procedure for addressing inherent risk questions in an audit context. Users can access a dedicated window to view up to 99 risk areas, answer questions, and modify responses as necessary. The system prompts users to validate changes to ensure proper risk assessments. It includes functionalities for viewing prior comments, copying text, and overriding calculated risk levels, emphasizing that auditor judgment is crucial. Comments on overrides must be provided to rationalize any adjustments made. The document serves as a guide for navigating and utilizing the auditing software effectively.